Diddy Trial Enters Fourth Day Amid Skepticism Over Prosecution’s Case
As the Diddy trial progresses into its fourth day, questions are mounting regarding the strength and direction of the prosecution’s case. Many observers are beginning to wonder if the prosecution ever possessed significant evidence, or if they are intentionally presenting a weak case. Speculation even includes the possibility that the involvement of James Comey’s daughter in the prosecution suggests the proceedings might be more for show.
Despite anticipation for serious charges and evidence, particularly concerning racketeering, trafficking, or RICO violations, such information has yet to materialize in court. The trial is scheduled for only about two weeks, raising concerns about the remaining time to present a compelling case.
Evidence presented thus far appears largely focused on the hiring of escorts and the turbulent relationship with his former girlfriend, Cassie. We have seen text messages between the two that, to us, seem to paint a picture of Cassie being quite enthusiastic and flexible about scheduling events referred to as “freakoffs”. For example, in texts, she suggests potential days like a Friday weekend or even during the week, stating, “I’m always ready to freak off lol you tell me the day you choose”, and later being “extremely flexible”. This reading of the texts appears to contrast sharply with Cassie’s testimony on the stand, where she reportedly claimed she was forced to participate.
Beyond the texts, only footage from an InterContinental Hotel showing Diddy hitting Cassie has been definitively presented by the state.
Other claims have surfaced during the trial, including one brought up where Megyn Kelly alleged seeing Diddy dry thrusting a Kardashian in a Met Gala bathroom. While this alleged incident is certainly degenerate, we note it is not illegal. Reports and internet rumors have also mentioned other celebrities potentially being involved in alleged parties, such as Ellen Degeneres and Justin Bieber, but no state evidence connecting them has been presented. A connection to Hakeem Jeffries has also been floated, linking him to “communist party freakoffs” involving costumed performers, though the source for this information appears questionable, originating from Newsmax.
Superstar Britney Spears was also reportedly mentioned during Cassie’s testimony concerning a 21st birthday party. It’s suggested that events at such parties might potentially offer an explanation for Spears’ current mental state.
The prosecution seems heavily focused on portraying the relationship between Diddy and Cassie as degenerate. Diddy, meanwhile, has appeared relaxed at the defense table, dressed in his own clothes from a limited rotation of five looks.
Among the myriad of accusations, a Jane Doe described Diddy’s body part with the peculiar comparison to a “Tootsie Roll”. However, claims that Diddy laced baby oil with GHB have seemingly been dispelled. Cassie testified that she was the one who purchased the Johnson and Johnson baby oil from the drugstore and only heated it up, explicitly stating there was no dosing involved. Cassie and Diddy were also said to have called each other “get high partners”.
Given the evidence presented so far, which largely points to Diddy being aggressive, controlling, or putting his hands on Cassie, some question if the aim is to charge him for being a “jerk or being a creep,” which is not against the law. While domestic incidents could be pursued, it’s unclear if those would be retroactively charged.
There are reportedly 70 or 80 other cases heating up against Diddy. However, it is striking that despite the numerous accusations and lawsuits seeking financial compensation, not a single criminal charge seems to have materialized from these other cases so far.
Frankly, based on what we have seen as of day four, the prosecution’s performance appears shaky. It seems either they are deliberately mishandling the case or lacked the promised evidence from the outset. We are being told to wait for more, but with limited time left in the trial, they will need to present substantial evidence soon. We certainly hope this is just the tip of the iceberg, because right now, we are not seeing much of anything that supports the grave initial accusations.