Karmelo Anthony BUSTED LYING About Threats! Fundraiser Built On Fraud? Cease & Desist Letters Sent
April 28, 2025
New BOMBSHELL Female Blackhawk Pilot IGNORED Desperate PLEAS By Male Co-Pilot To Avoid Tragic Crash
April 28, 2025
Buffalo School District Accused of Massive Cover-Up in Child Safety Investigations
A Buffalo police detective is making serious accusations against the Buffalo Public School District, alleging a massive cover-up regarding investigations into child safety and abuse among students. Detective Richard High, who works with the special victim’s unit, has spoken out on a viral YouTube podcast, claiming the district is actively obstructing justice.
According to Detective High, the school district’s administration and their legal representatives are intentionally killing cases, preventing information from reaching detectives and the assistant district attorney’s office, destroying evidence, and ignoring subpoenas.
Specific examples cited include an incident at an elementary school connected to a museum where a creep allegedly attempted to abduct a boy and a girl. It is claimed that the security footage was deleted, and the boy’s parents were never even told about the attempted abduction, leaving them unaware of why their son was distressed.
Another disturbing case mentioned involves a student who was allegedly sexually assaulted near a school pool. This case reportedly did not get reported through official channels. Instead, the principal allegedly conducted their own investigation, deeming the girl a liar and writing a scathing report. A year later, when the student reportedly went to the police, no evidence was available because the case had not been properly reported initially.
Detective High states that speaking out is the right thing to do, even if it puts his job at risk, noting he’s willing to take that risk. He believes applying public pressure is crucial. The police union president has expressed support for High.
The Buffalo School District spokesperson has denied the claims, calling them “unfortunate and untrue” and stating the district is prepared to vigorously address these untruths. Superintendent Dr. Tanja Williams Knight shared that she will be taking a break from social media following the accusations.
While the district maintains it has prioritized the safety and security of its students and staff, the allegations suggest the opposite, accusing the school system of actively attempting to destroy evidence and refusing to report incidents. There is a strong belief that the school system cannot be trusted to police this issue internally.
Some have noted that these actions appear to be protecting some of the worst people on the planet, suggesting that individuals culpable, including leadership, for shielding crimes against kids should be removed, jailed, and charged.
Furthermore, a connection has been drawn between the alleged cover-up and the school district’s ideology. Reports from 2021 highlighted the district’s subscription to a far-left ideology and a mandatory anti-racism curriculum. This curriculum reportedly claimed that “All white people perpetuate systemic racism” and mandated training for teachers to become “woke” and achieve “critical consciousness”. It is also reported that a mandatory BLM curriculum required students to commit to dismantling cisgender privilege, creating queer affirming networks, and accelerating the disruption of Western nuclear family dynamics. It is argued that this is the same school district that’s been covering up the crimes against its students.
Given the severity of these accusations, there is a call for immediate escalation to the federal level and for continued public pressure. We are also urged to examine our own local school districts for similar issues.
Note: This article is based on information from the provided sources. As requested by the user, this response is formatted as a news article and does not explicitly reference the source transcripts or use third-person references to the video creator. Due to these formatting constraints and negative instructions, it was not possible to include in-text citations for specific statements as initially outlined in the general instructions.
