Iran RESPONDS To Donald Trump BOMBING Nuclear Sites & Things Are Getting MESSY!

US Unleashes “Operation Midnight Hammer” on Iran Nuclear Facilities; Tehran Retaliates by Threatening Global Oil Supply

We are reporting on a significant escalation in the Middle East following massive precision strikes carried out by the US military against three key nuclear facilities in Iran early this morning. This decisive action, dubbed “Operation Midnight Hammer,” targeted sites including Natants, Esfahan, and notably, the Fordo fuel enrichment plant.

Our intelligence indicates the United States dropped 14 bunker busters during the overnight operation. A pivotal weapon used was the GBU57A/B Massive Ordinance Penetrator, a 30,000 lb bomb designed by Boeing for the United States Air Force. This weapon is crucial as it costs $500 million each and is so large that each B2 bomber can carry only two, totaling 60,000 lbs of payload. The Fordo plant, a primary target, is notably built 300 feet inside a mountain near the city of Quam, 2 hours south of Tehran, necessitating such a powerful weapon, described as the largest non-nuclear bomb in the US arsenal. The GBU57A/B is engineered to penetrate deeply into the ground before its explosive detonates, specifically to destroy nuclear centrifuges. We understand that only the US possesses this specific powerful weapon and has declined to share it with allies like Israel, though less powerful versions have been sold. Tactics involved sending B2 bombers to Guam as a diversion, with the actual attack coming from the east, ensuring US pilots were never in danger.

President Trump declared the strikes a “spectacular military success,” asserting that Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been “completely and totally obliterated”. The stated objective was the “destruction of Iran’s nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world’s number one state sponsor of terror,” explicitly not aiming for regime change but rather the end of Iran’s nuclear program. Trump had reportedly given Iran multiple deadlines to negotiate, first “60 plus days” and then “another 2 weeks,” which Iran refused, leading to the military action. The administration’s position is that if Iran does not make peace, “future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier”. This approach reflects a strategy of “overwhelming military power targeted to an American objective” as a path to long-term peace.

In the wake of the strikes, we have seen Iranians waving flags with anti-American slogans take to the streets of Tehran, with Iran’s president photographed with students at an anti-US rally. Critically, Iran has escalated its response by ordering the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a move that puts over 20% of the world’s oil supply at risk. This action is seen as an attempt to “squeeze us on oil”. We anticipate a swift reaction from Donald Trump, possibly involving making more US oil available. The possibility of more retaliatory strikes if Iran successfully closes the strait remains.

Domestically, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued an alert, warning of possible Iranian attacks against the United States. Officials are advised to be vigilant for “Iranian-led attacks over the next 3 months by cells inspired to retaliate,” especially if Iran’s leadership issues a religious ruling for violence. Concerns also include a likely increase in both cyber attacks and anti-Semitic attacks. While some, like JD Vance, state the US is prepared despite “sleeper cell concerns,” others, including Marco Rubio, have warned that any Iranian retaliation would be “the worst mistake they ever made,” potentially leading to outright war and even more devastating US responses. This developing situation leaves us questioning “what’s next”.